Posted: Sat Nov 12, 2022 2:28pm
Hi Cisco,
I haven't called Dr. John Campbell "a nut case conspiralist", but he isn't an expert in the matters he insists on discussing. As he has introduced his own video on the Parliamentary debate by saying he can't comment on it because of his own ignorance on the matter, do you not think to yourself, "So why make the video at all?". Could his motivation for making such videos be driven by his ego, having amassed 2.55m subscribers? Or perhaps it's the money he's making from a share of the advertising revenue from his 564m views? Do you know how much money a prolific YouTuber can make from their channel? Even without merchandising, Dr. Campbell could be making over £100k per year, simply by tapping into the fear of others. Have you read the disclaimer on Dr. Cambell's YouTube channel? Thousands of his videos, a book, eBooks and Podcasts - and none of them are peer reviewed.
As for "The vacced can't catch covid and they can't spread it", not even the pharma companies that manufactured the vaccines made those claims. At the beginning of the roll-out, Pfizer claimed 93% efficacy against Covid-19, AstraZeneca around 91%, and others trailing behind with some as low as 65% efficacy. Unless a vaccine offers 100% protection, it can never be claimed that it prevents people from catching or spreading a virus. Claims were made that the vaccines reduced the likelihood of catching Covid-19, but most importantly, they significantly reduce cases of people becoming severely ill and requiring hospitalisation. Expert virologists also warned of the possibility of the original SARS-CoV-2 virus mutating - and it has, many times. In response to this, some of the Covid vaccines have been adapted to protect against the more recent strains. This is exactly what has to be done for the 'flu vaccine each year.
It doesn't concern me that we disagree on these matters, but I am concerned that Dr. Campbell, who openly admits that he is not qualified to comment, continues to do so. I don't take issue with your opinions - you're entitled to them - but I do take issue with your choice of source material.
Kind regards,
Kim