Posted: Mon Nov 4, 2019 4:21pm
The difference with the rugby world cup is it happens every 4 years so the result changes every four years. By next June it will be four years since the 2016 referendum so under your analogy we should have another go then!
In 2015 we voted in an general election for a government on a fixed term of 5 years - we did the same again two years later in 2017 and now we are doing the same again two and half years later in 2019! Are the 2015 and 2017 election results therefore democratic votes that are being 'ignored' or 'overturned'?
To be democratic something, by definition, must also be 100% legal. On 3 separate occasions there have been rulings that the campaigns and/or vote were not legal - 17.7.18 by the EC, 14.9.18 by the High Court and 21.11.18 in a JR, plus on 21.2.19 the PM's QC (Sir James Eadie) stated in the High Court in the case of Wilson and others -v- PM and EC, that May was fully aware of the FACT that "the 2016 referendum leave vote was corrupt and illegal as defined by the Representation of the People Act 1983", (you can find that on u-tube and watch the whole proceedings to hear that admission). If the referendum had been legally binding, (it was and remains only legally advisory under the Act under which it was initiated), then it would, under UK law and under the Vienna Convention, have been declared null and void. So, in legal terms the 2016 vote was not legal, binding, democratic or final.
I am also somewhat puzzled by your 'rich remainers' idea when "vote leave" and "leave.eu" were (and are still) funded by billionaires. No doubt there are rich and poor in both camps.
You also refer just to GB, which excludes NI. That has been one of the biggest problems surrounding this, people not understanding the NI/Ireland issue and just dismissing it.