Posted: Wed Jul 19, 2023 5:34pm
Hi V2,
"To compare eg: poliio virus: if one contracts polio, (normally via faeces of someone with the infection, or with the droplets launched into the air), masks were never considered as a solution [This disease was thought to be all but eradicated (99.9%) but due to disruptions and with anti-vaccine sentiment spreading across the world, the virus is making a big comeback (May, 2022).]"
My comparison was simply about a novel virus in its early evolution, versus a much better established virus that was eventually eradicated (UK in 1984 and Europe in 2003). And yes, cases of Polio are on the rise, but as your comment concedes, vaccines can't work in people who refuse to have them.
"But, talking vaccines aside, we were considering about variant airbourneAerosol mask-wearing mutating viruses, (ie:common cold, influenza, sars/covid etc. which as you already know is impossible to eradicate ). In other words. regarding "Masks no longer required in medical settings"
You quoted WHO results You stated ["February 2023,"] I could only find,]["Last updated December 2021"].https://healthpolicy-watch.news/who-firm-masks-strategy-against-covid-19/
In January 2023, Archie Cochrane published a comprehensive analysis of 78 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) conducted in several countries over a period of time, including six RCTs conducted during COVID-19 pandemic, concluded that wearing face masks “makes little or no difference to the outcome of influenza‐like illness (ILI)/COVID-19 like illness compared to not wearing masks”.
Although the WHO still stands by it´s original statements although that mask wearing seems to be being "enforceably" abandoned, as we see, regarding the uncertainty about the effects of face masks, read:. https://healthpolicy-watch.news/who-firm-masks-strategy-against-covid-19/"
Cochrane Reviews are generally highly respected. However, the particular review that you have quoted has been subject to criticism from around the World - not for the process itself, but because of the misleading conclusions drawn by its researchers:
"...some experts objected to some of the language the authors used to summarize their results and took issue with certain decisions and interpretations of the review. All agreed that it was incorrect to conclude that the review shows masks “don’t work.”
https://www.factcheck.org/2023/03/scicheck-what-the-cochrane-review-says-about-masks-for-covid-19-and-what-it-doesnt/
Personally, I do not believe that the efficacy, or not, of masks has led to the decision to lift compulsory wearing. I believe that, as humans, it's very important for us to be able to see each other's faces when we communicate. That's not to say that we can't communicate when wearing masks, but we may miss the social cues that come from non-verbal facial expressions, so our natural preference is not to wear them. In so far as the science is concerned, I think the best we can say at the moment is that further research is needed, but like vaccines, masks won't work if people have them strung under their chin or hanging off their wrist. Unfortunately, if Government scientists need to recommend mandatory wearing of masks again, there will always be people who think they're above the law.
Kind regards,
Kim