Britain looks to break International law - Brexit and the EU: living, holidaying and moving to Torrevieja - Torrevieja forum - Costa Blanca forum in the Alicante province of Spain
Gentlevan Removals
ASSSA Insurance
James Spanish School
AA Free English TV
Airport Service Taxi Mil Palmeras  Torre de la Horadada
Thy Will Be Done
interior building work
Jennifer Cunningham Insurances SL
Car Key Solutions
Blacktower Financial Management
Espana Dream Properties
Gran Alacant Insurances
Expat Services
Costa Blanca Building Specialists

Join the Torrevieja forum

Join the Torrevieja forumMy name's Alex and this is my website all about Torrevieja in Spain. Register now for free to talk about Brexit and the EU: living, holidaying and moving to Torrevieja and much more!

Britain looks to break International law - Page 3

Declan2

Posted: Sun Sep 13, 2020 10:08pm

Declan2

Helpful member

Posts: 318

241 helpful points

Location: Torrevieja

Joined: 19 Jan 2019

Posted: Sun Sep 13, 2020 10:08pm

Wilbur wrote on Sun Sep 13, 2020 8:23pm:

I agree with most of what you say, but caveat it with the pattern seen by many who used to be traditional unionists, especially the young, are opting to exert their Irishness.  

Britain had no place in Ireland 300 years, ago, despite the plantation of Scots in to Ulster. It possibly has less place in modern day peacetimes. And indeed, Bojo dropped the Unionists at the first opportunity once he got what he wanted. ...

...

That should serve as a reminder to all on the Island and the wider EU. 

There's so much room for irony in Irish/British history you almost couldn't make it up, but one trap that personally I believe is a dead-end is trying to rewrite what happened and demand it be otherwise. "It is what it is"  as the saying goes. For good or ill the 'Ulster Plantation' with loyal Scots colonists laid some of the groundwork for what happened subsequently, but the fact remains that the Scots descendants are in Ireland, and indeed the flag of southern Ireland includes orange to remember William of Orange as well as Green for what could loosely be called Nationalists, and white between the colors for peace.  It's ironic that the loyalists burn the orange of their own origin when they routinely burn the Irish tricolor every July as they recall a battle in 1690. History is alive and well up north. Fact is, in the south, most people, virtually everyone has some British or English connection. My neighbors in Dublin on both sides are Nelson and Foster, and my mother's maiden name was 'Montgomery.'  In the south nobody cares. It simply doesn't arise as any kind of issue.

 A couple of other almost farcical situations :

The same vehement DUP MP's who demand the right to 'British identity' have no issue signing Irish government  applications for their constituents for Irish passports so they can travel freely in the EU.

The former UK ambassador to Ireland got an Irish passport based on his Belfast heritage.  Maggie Thatcher had Irish forebears. 

When British people (in mainland UK) were asked to draw the Irish border on an outline of Ireland, they weren't even approximately right. 

When the DUP (democratic Unionist Party) held the balance of power in Mrs. May's ill-fated election, the largest Google search in the UK that night was 'Who are the DUP.'

Many of the historical revolutionary leaders in Ireland, were in  fact, Protestants.

When Ireland staged a revolution in 1916 it wasn't widely supported. But the utter destruction of  central Dublin by a British gunboat, the imposition of martial law and the execution of the leaders  changed public opinion. One newspaper at the time  described the executions as like 'watching blood seep from behind a locked door.' British forces also burned Cork in subsequent reprisals 

The leaders of the revolution were masters in theatrics and the British played into it. They were undoubtedly brave men (and one woman) but they surrendered in the face of overwhelming force by presenting a sword to the British General, who, unwittingly accepted it,  the revolutionaries thereby gained equivalence with the British army in the eyes of the world.  An army commander surrendering to another army commander.

 Putting their signatures of the Declaration of Independence they wrote their own death warrants and they must have known that. In fact they welcomed it. And from this, arose the concept of the 'blood sacrifice' which the IRA would deploy to devastating effects in latter years. The basic premise  when confronting an enemy you simply cannot defeat is to be prepared to die, often horribly; as in the hunger strikes,  to be willing to  offer a 'blood sacrifice' and defeat the opponent not be force of arms. but by a capacity for suffering that knows literally no bounds. Like it or not, this tactic often worked.

British forces at the time threatened a mutiny if asked to march on the North to supress the loyalists. It was called the Curragh mutiny. So, Ireland, which had a majority  of Nationalists, was forcibly divided in the  final settlement of Independence. No majority rule in this case. The loyalists, to prove their loyalty, were willing to die in vast numbers in WW1 but I suspect they never trusted  (and still don't) the Westminster Parliament, and loyalists has often been anything but loyal. The fearful and angry language of many 'loyalists' is often about 'sell-out' and 'no surrender.' It is a sad fact that they seem unloved in the UK mainland. 

As an aside, the declaration of Independence is an amazing piece of oratorical work, and worthy of great praise, but the (southern) Ireland that emerged was hijacked by the Catholic church - the very church previously opposed to Independence. 

The journey away from a church dominated state was accelerated by  clerical abuse, and the attempt to cover it up, but the modern Ireland that emerged is pluralistic, multicultural, and very liberal.  It was the first (and only country) to vote for gay marriage which passed by popular consent. Abortion and divorce are also legal.  A gay Prime Minister, and nobody gives a damn. What an-about-face  change. 

The problem in Irish/British relations is often one of ignorance. The British simply don't  KNOW Ireland. It is reduced to  a country of quaint, simple farmers, living in a green idyll with funny accents; overly fond of drinking and fighting.  Again, this is a colonial narrative. If the Irish are stupid and incompetent, they NEED smart, competent Brits to run things, so this narrative isn't just wrong, it is a tool of colonialism. And it continues, Think of "Father Ted"  or more recently 'Derry Girls."  The Irish often like them, not so much for the innate comic value, but just because they play on British stereotypes of which the Irish are often painfully aware and the British are not.  I worked for a British company in Dublin. Visiting directors from the UK would talk about 'on the mainland.'  Colleagues in Basingstoke (not exactly a million miles away)  would ask is 'Dublin in  the UK and do we use the pound?'   We still have some distance to travel in this respect. 

Declan2

Posted: Sun Sep 13, 2020 10:19pm

Declan2

Helpful member

Posts: 318

241 helpful points

Location: Torrevieja

Joined: 19 Jan 2019

Posted: Sun Sep 13, 2020 10:19pm

Getting back on the point of the reneging on the Withdrawal treaty, there are fantastic quotes from  the fantastic movie 'A Man for All Seasons' apropos dispensing with irksome laws.

William Roper: “So, now you give the Devil the benefit of law!”

Sir Thomas More: “Yes! What would you do? Cut a great road through the law to get after the Devil?”

William Roper: “Yes, I'd cut down every law in England to do that!”

Sir Thomas More: “Oh? And when the last law was down, and the Devil turned 'round on you, where would you hide, Roper, the laws all being flat? This country is planted thick with laws, from coast to coast, Man's laws, not God's! And if you cut them down, and you're just the man to do it, do you really think you could stand upright in the winds that would blow then? Yes, I'd give the Devil benefit of law, for my own safety's sake!

“When statesmen forsake their own private conscience for the sake of their public duties, they lead their country by a short route to chaos.”

“The law is not a "light" for you or any man to see by; the law is not an instrument of any kind. ...The law is a causeway upon which, so long as he keeps to it, a citizen may walk safely."

“When a man takes an oath, Meg, he's holding his own self in his own hands. Like water (he cups his hands) and if he opens his fingers then, he needn't hope to find himself again. Some men aren't capable of this, but I'd be loathe to think your father one of them.”

― Robert Bolt, A Man for All Seasons

I think BoJo needs to watch this with his sidekick Gove and the rest of the Conservative Party. 

premieroneuk

Posted: Sun Sep 13, 2020 10:28pm

premieroneuk

Helpful member

Posts: 71

146 helpful points

Location: Torrevieja

Joined: 14 Nov 2019

Posted: Sun Sep 13, 2020 10:28pm

Declan2 wrote on Sun Sep 13, 2020 10:08pm:

There's so much room for irony in Irish/British history you almost couldn't make it up, but one trap that personally I believe is a dead-end is trying to rewrite what happened and demand it be otherwise. "It is what it is"  as the saying goes. For good or ill the 'Ulster Plantation' with loy...

...al Scots colonists laid some of the groundwork for what happened subsequently, but the fact remains that the Scots descendants are in Ireland, and indeed the flag of southern Ireland includes orange to remember William of Orange as well as Green for what could loosely be called Nationalists, and white between the colors for peace.  It's ironic that the loyalists burn the orange of their own origin when they routinely burn the Irish tricolor every July as they recall a battle in 1690. History is alive and well up north. Fact is, in the south, most people, virtually everyone has some British or English connection. My neighbors in Dublin on both sides are Nelson and Foster, and my mother's maiden name was 'Montgomery.'  In the south nobody cares. It simply doesn't arise as any kind of issue.

 A couple of other almost farcical situations :

The same vehement DUP MP's who demand the right to 'British identity' have no issue signing Irish government  applications for their constituents for Irish passports so they can travel freely in the EU.

The former UK ambassador to Ireland got an Irish passport based on his Belfast heritage.  Maggie Thatcher had Irish forebears. 

When British people (in mainland UK) were asked to draw the Irish border on an outline of Ireland, they weren't even approximately right. 

When the DUP (democratic Unionist Party) held the balance of power in Mrs. May's ill-fated election, the largest Google search in the UK that night was 'Who are the DUP.'

Many of the historical revolutionary leaders in Ireland, were in  fact, Protestants.

When Ireland staged a revolution in 1916 it wasn't widely supported. But the utter destruction of  central Dublin by a British gunboat, the imposition of martial law and the execution of the leaders  changed public opinion. One newspaper at the time  described the executions as like 'watching blood seep from behind a locked door.' British forces also burned Cork in subsequent reprisals 

The leaders of the revolution were masters in theatrics and the British played into it. They were undoubtedly brave men (and one woman) but they surrendered in the face of overwhelming force by presenting a sword to the British General, who, unwittingly accepted it,  the revolutionaries thereby gained equivalence with the British army in the eyes of the world.  An army commander surrendering to another army commander.

 Putting their signatures of the Declaration of Independence they wrote their own death warrants and they must have known that. In fact they welcomed it. And from this, arose the concept of the 'blood sacrifice' which the IRA would deploy to devastating effects in latter years. The basic premise  when confronting an enemy you simply cannot defeat is to be prepared to die, often horribly; as in the hunger strikes,  to be willing to  offer a 'blood sacrifice' and defeat the opponent not be force of arms. but by a capacity for suffering that knows literally no bounds. Like it or not, this tactic often worked.

British forces at the time threatened a mutiny if asked to march on the North to supress the loyalists. It was called the Curragh mutiny. So, Ireland, which had a majority  of Nationalists, was forcibly divided in the  final settlement of Independence. No majority rule in this case. The loyalists, to prove their loyalty, were willing to die in vast numbers in WW1 but I suspect they never trusted  (and still don't) the Westminster Parliament, and loyalists has often been anything but loyal. The fearful and angry language of many 'loyalists' is often about 'sell-out' and 'no surrender.' It is a sad fact that they seem unloved in the UK mainland. 

As an aside, the declaration of Independence is an amazing piece of oratorical work, and worthy of great praise, but the (southern) Ireland that emerged was hijacked by the Catholic church - the very church previously opposed to Independence. 

The journey away from a church dominated state was accelerated by  clerical abuse, and the attempt to cover it up, but the modern Ireland that emerged is pluralistic, multicultural, and very liberal.  It was the first (and only country) to vote for gay marriage which passed by popular consent. Abortion and divorce are also legal.  A gay Prime Minister, and nobody gives a damn. What an-about-face  change. 

The problem in Irish/British relations is often one of ignorance. The British simply don't  KNOW Ireland. It is reduced to  a country of quaint, simple farmers, living in a green idyll with funny accents; overly fond of drinking and fighting.  Again, this is a colonial narrative. If the Irish are stupid and incompetent, they NEED smart, competent Brits to run things, so this narrative isn't just wrong, it is a tool of colonialism. And it continues, Think of "Father Ted"  or more recently 'Derry Girls."  The Irish often like them, not so much for the innate comic value, but just because they play on British stereotypes of which the Irish are often painfully aware and the British are not.  I worked for a British company in Dublin. Visiting directors from the UK would talk about 'on the mainland.'  Colleagues in Basingstoke (not exactly a million miles away)  would ask is 'Dublin in  the UK and do we use the pound?'   We still have some distance to travel in this respect. 

And to add

The Republic this year overtook the UK

In GDP/Capita so they now wealthier than UK

But of far greater importance is the measure of economic productivity

And for the last 8 yrs The Republic is racing miles ahead of the Sloth like UK

Productivity is NOT people working harder

It increases due to

1.Proper education

2.Employee training

3.Good investment that is aimed at improving productivity

4.Employers,Employees and Government

Developing proper social policies that benefit all

Look at Germany what takes a German to produce in 35 hours

The UK worker has to work 52 hrs to produce the same

And the divergence grows every year

Germany is also beginning to greatly benifit

By the influx of 1 million educated and motivated refugees and at a stroke has solved the severe demographics that were leading to serious problems in the future re.public services,health and pensions

E.G.one bright young Syrian graduated in IT and AI now employs 8000 people and

Rated as the most promising start up enterprise in the whole of EU for years

Comares

Posted: Mon Sep 14, 2020 12:13am

Comares

Helpful member

Posts: 122

87 helpful points

Location: Torrevieja

Joined: 22 Feb 2020

Posted: Mon Sep 14, 2020 12:13am

Declan2 wrote on Sun Sep 13, 2020 10:08pm:

There's so much room for irony in Irish/British history you almost couldn't make it up, but one trap that personally I believe is a dead-end is trying to rewrite what happened and demand it be otherwise. "It is what it is"  as the saying goes. For good or ill the 'Ulster Plantation' with loy...

...al Scots colonists laid some of the groundwork for what happened subsequently, but the fact remains that the Scots descendants are in Ireland, and indeed the flag of southern Ireland includes orange to remember William of Orange as well as Green for what could loosely be called Nationalists, and white between the colors for peace.  It's ironic that the loyalists burn the orange of their own origin when they routinely burn the Irish tricolor every July as they recall a battle in 1690. History is alive and well up north. Fact is, in the south, most people, virtually everyone has some British or English connection. My neighbors in Dublin on both sides are Nelson and Foster, and my mother's maiden name was 'Montgomery.'  In the south nobody cares. It simply doesn't arise as any kind of issue.

 A couple of other almost farcical situations :

The same vehement DUP MP's who demand the right to 'British identity' have no issue signing Irish government  applications for their constituents for Irish passports so they can travel freely in the EU.

The former UK ambassador to Ireland got an Irish passport based on his Belfast heritage.  Maggie Thatcher had Irish forebears. 

When British people (in mainland UK) were asked to draw the Irish border on an outline of Ireland, they weren't even approximately right. 

When the DUP (democratic Unionist Party) held the balance of power in Mrs. May's ill-fated election, the largest Google search in the UK that night was 'Who are the DUP.'

Many of the historical revolutionary leaders in Ireland, were in  fact, Protestants.

When Ireland staged a revolution in 1916 it wasn't widely supported. But the utter destruction of  central Dublin by a British gunboat, the imposition of martial law and the execution of the leaders  changed public opinion. One newspaper at the time  described the executions as like 'watching blood seep from behind a locked door.' British forces also burned Cork in subsequent reprisals 

The leaders of the revolution were masters in theatrics and the British played into it. They were undoubtedly brave men (and one woman) but they surrendered in the face of overwhelming force by presenting a sword to the British General, who, unwittingly accepted it,  the revolutionaries thereby gained equivalence with the British army in the eyes of the world.  An army commander surrendering to another army commander.

 Putting their signatures of the Declaration of Independence they wrote their own death warrants and they must have known that. In fact they welcomed it. And from this, arose the concept of the 'blood sacrifice' which the IRA would deploy to devastating effects in latter years. The basic premise  when confronting an enemy you simply cannot defeat is to be prepared to die, often horribly; as in the hunger strikes,  to be willing to  offer a 'blood sacrifice' and defeat the opponent not be force of arms. but by a capacity for suffering that knows literally no bounds. Like it or not, this tactic often worked.

British forces at the time threatened a mutiny if asked to march on the North to supress the loyalists. It was called the Curragh mutiny. So, Ireland, which had a majority  of Nationalists, was forcibly divided in the  final settlement of Independence. No majority rule in this case. The loyalists, to prove their loyalty, were willing to die in vast numbers in WW1 but I suspect they never trusted  (and still don't) the Westminster Parliament, and loyalists has often been anything but loyal. The fearful and angry language of many 'loyalists' is often about 'sell-out' and 'no surrender.' It is a sad fact that they seem unloved in the UK mainland. 

As an aside, the declaration of Independence is an amazing piece of oratorical work, and worthy of great praise, but the (southern) Ireland that emerged was hijacked by the Catholic church - the very church previously opposed to Independence. 

The journey away from a church dominated state was accelerated by  clerical abuse, and the attempt to cover it up, but the modern Ireland that emerged is pluralistic, multicultural, and very liberal.  It was the first (and only country) to vote for gay marriage which passed by popular consent. Abortion and divorce are also legal.  A gay Prime Minister, and nobody gives a damn. What an-about-face  change. 

The problem in Irish/British relations is often one of ignorance. The British simply don't  KNOW Ireland. It is reduced to  a country of quaint, simple farmers, living in a green idyll with funny accents; overly fond of drinking and fighting.  Again, this is a colonial narrative. If the Irish are stupid and incompetent, they NEED smart, competent Brits to run things, so this narrative isn't just wrong, it is a tool of colonialism. And it continues, Think of "Father Ted"  or more recently 'Derry Girls."  The Irish often like them, not so much for the innate comic value, but just because they play on British stereotypes of which the Irish are often painfully aware and the British are not.  I worked for a British company in Dublin. Visiting directors from the UK would talk about 'on the mainland.'  Colleagues in Basingstoke (not exactly a million miles away)  would ask is 'Dublin in  the UK and do we use the pound?'   We still have some distance to travel in this respect. 

You are right about some of the early revolutionaries being Protestant. They were the only ones who had any power and education. Few of the ordinary Irish had access to education. There was a group of influential Protestants who saw and used the French Revolution as their model to establish the United Irishmen. It is interesting that the first President of the Irish Republic was a Protestant.

Alba102

Posted: Mon Sep 14, 2020 1:04pm

Posts: 50

48 helpful points

Joined: 2 Sep 2016

Posted: Mon Sep 14, 2020 1:04pm

Comares wrote on Mon Sep 14, 2020 12:13am:

You are right about some of the early revolutionaries being Protestant. They were the only ones who had any power and education. Few of the ordinary Irish had access to education. There was a group of influential Protestants who saw and used the French Revolution as their model to establish the U...

...nited Irishmen. It is interesting that the first President of the Irish Republic was a Protestant.

Congratulations to you and Declan.

Your posts are excellent examples of how a mature, educated and interesting (political) discussion ought to be conducted on a forum, or in any medium. They have elements of educating the reader as to how the current situation arose. They also cite examples and quotations from historical figures.

They also demonstrate how one can disagree respectfully with the other. ie" I agree with most of what you say".

They also demonstrate that opinions can be respected without the historical vitriol meted out on previous posts on this forum. Well Done Guys.

Advertisement - posts continue below

Alba102

Posted: Mon Sep 14, 2020 1:40pm

Posts: 50

48 helpful points

Joined: 2 Sep 2016

Posted: Mon Sep 14, 2020 1:40pm

I replied earlier to this post. I, of course, meant to mention all of the contributors who made constructive and thought provoking posts on this subject.

You all demonstrated how to conduct a civilised discussion.

Declan2

Posted: Tue Sep 15, 2020 10:01pm

Declan2

Helpful member

Posts: 318

241 helpful points

Location: Torrevieja

Joined: 19 Jan 2019

Posted: Tue Sep 15, 2020 10:01pm

Wilbur wrote on Sun Sep 13, 2020 7:50pm:

Excellent points and very well put Declan. 

However, I suspect that Nationists in the north of the Island probably feel more Irish than many in Dublin do, due to their alienation from those shared cultural bonds you speak of and of suffering most at the hand of the British.  Not a unique experience under the failed British Empire of c...

...ourse. 

As I said, the GFA and associated social and economic benefits must be preserved at all costs and why many top UK politicians and Lawyers, as, well as every sane mind in UK, Eire, EU and USA are so feverently opposed to this attempt by Bojo and his carpet baggers. 

We're in it now, after Bojo pulled-off the vote. The EU is the UK's primary trading partner. The US is the second, and they have already indicated they will not sign-off on a Trade Treaty with the UK if the GFA/Belfast Accord is endangered. This is regardless of Trump's waffle. The Democrats hold the house. They get to sanction or block trade deals regardless of the President. The EU  is fundamentally a  creature of law. They cannot backtrack on a signed treaty. We're up the proverbial creek. 

This is simply daft dressed as political maneuvering; attempting  to 'go kamikaze' as the Irish deputy Prime Minister said . The driving force for this is a recalcitrant nationalism - an English nationalism, determined to press the nuclear button for a pure, and illusory 'uber-Independence' regardless of the consequences or the impact on the UK Union itself.  This move is more likely to push Scotland towards the door and NI to reevaluate its  interests.  One thing is certain. The likes of Rees-Mogg, Farrage and BoJo won't suffer.   The Daily Telegraph or Express  ran a headline a year or so ago, 'Who will speak for England?' It was a Freudian slip.  They meant 'who will speak for the UK?' But the the actual original  headline seems closer to the truth of the matter. Now we know who speaks for England and what they are saying. It very much looks like two fingers.

Wilbur

Posted: Tue Sep 15, 2020 10:40pm

Wilbur

Original Poster

Very helpful member

Posts: 424

641 helpful points

Location: Torrevieja

Joined: 29 Nov 2017

Posted: Tue Sep 15, 2020 10:40pm

Declan2 wrote on Tue Sep 15, 2020 10:01pm:

We're in it now, after Bojo pulled-off the vote. The EU is the UK's primary trading partner. The US is the second, and they have already indicated they will not sign-off on a Trade Treaty with the UK if the GFA/Belfast Accord is endangered. This is regardless of Trump's waffle. The Democrats hold...

... the house. They get to sanction or block trade deals regardless of the President. The EU  is fundamentally a  creature of law. They cannot backtrack on a signed treaty. We're up the proverbial creek. 

This is simply daft dressed as political maneuvering; attempting  to 'go kamikaze' as the Irish deputy Prime Minister said . The driving force for this is a recalcitrant nationalism - an English nationalism, determined to press the nuclear button for a pure, and illusory 'uber-Independence' regardless of the consequences or the impact on the UK Union itself.  This move is more likely to push Scotland towards the door and NI to reevaluate its  interests.  One thing is certain. The likes of Rees-Mogg, Farrage and BoJo won't suffer.   The Daily Telegraph or Express  ran a headline a year or so ago, 'Who will speak for England?' It was a Freudian slip.  They meant 'who will speak for the UK?' But the the actual original  headline seems closer to the truth of the matter. Now we know who speaks for England and what they are saying. It very much looks like two fingers.

Bojo is an absolute chancer. 5 ex PMs now saying he's wrong.  Many a Lord saying he's wrong. 

He got savaged by Ed Millaband, torn to shreds. Think about that if you will. This is how bad a Leader the UK have at the moment. 

Part of me is horrified, another part thinks hell mend them. The break up of the UK is some legacy for him and Brexit. 

Brittania  waives the rules once more. 

premieroneuk

Posted: Wed Sep 16, 2020 3:44am

premieroneuk

Helpful member

Posts: 71

146 helpful points

Location: Torrevieja

Joined: 14 Nov 2019

Posted: Wed Sep 16, 2020 3:44am

Declan2 wrote on Tue Sep 15, 2020 10:01pm:

We're in it now, after Bojo pulled-off the vote. The EU is the UK's primary trading partner. The US is the second, and they have already indicated they will not sign-off on a Trade Treaty with the UK if the GFA/Belfast Accord is endangered. This is regardless of Trump's waffle. The Democrats hold...

... the house. They get to sanction or block trade deals regardless of the President. The EU  is fundamentally a  creature of law. They cannot backtrack on a signed treaty. We're up the proverbial creek. 

This is simply daft dressed as political maneuvering; attempting  to 'go kamikaze' as the Irish deputy Prime Minister said . The driving force for this is a recalcitrant nationalism - an English nationalism, determined to press the nuclear button for a pure, and illusory 'uber-Independence' regardless of the consequences or the impact on the UK Union itself.  This move is more likely to push Scotland towards the door and NI to reevaluate its  interests.  One thing is certain. The likes of Rees-Mogg, Farrage and BoJo won't suffer.   The Daily Telegraph or Express  ran a headline a year or so ago, 'Who will speak for England?' It was a Freudian slip.  They meant 'who will speak for the UK?' But the the actual original  headline seems closer to the truth of the matter. Now we know who speaks for England and what they are saying. It very much looks like two fingers.

The big trouble is that those in power who speak for England not for a moment do they know that in fact because they speak from Westminster and completely disregard Scotland,Wales and NI. and whilst we are it also for the outlying regions of England such as Devon & Cornwall Norththumbria  and a few other outlying regions all of whom have very very serious problems. But no means to rectify such other than to take matters into their own hands

Great Britain is now entering the death phase, technically bankrupt with very few resources  once Scotland departs

Senior academics are now in a most serious manner are stating that once England left on its own that the resultant impoverishment,corruption and inability to improve matters

Will lead to severe civil unrest that is more than capable of evolving into a full blown 2nd English civil war

History clearly demonstrates that when Empires  enter their final state of deacy

And death throes the one sure fire sign is when its leaders begin to refer to Make us great again,world class

A bright new dawn etc.etc

Then the final end and implosion is indeed nigh

And not only that at the final collapse then the whole thing ends up having retreated inward further than the boundaries of its birth  

This is not rocket science

Simply just ask yourself honestly what has Westminster got to offer other than decline,impoverishment,collapsing state pensions and health service etc etc 

People are not stupid they are beginning to wake up. Scotland has already done so and will Never rest till free

Does Boris think that telling us not to board the life boats  OF INDENPENDENCE upon The Sinking SS Britania saying that it is only a minor plumbing problem the ship has has its bow sinks below the water Line

And no amount of living in the past waving little Union Jacks singing Rule Britania or Land of Hope of Hope and Glory can possibly save it from its self inflicted sinking

It has already been fatally wounded below the water line and its fate sealed

END OF

Wilbur

Posted: Wed Sep 16, 2020 9:21am

Wilbur

Original Poster

Very helpful member

Posts: 424

641 helpful points

Location: Torrevieja

Joined: 29 Nov 2017

Posted: Wed Sep 16, 2020 9:21am

premieroneuk wrote on Wed Sep 16, 2020 3:44am:

The big trouble is that those in power who speak for England not for a moment do they know that in fact because they speak from Westminster and completely disregard Scotland,Wales and NI. and whilst we are it also for the outlying regions of England such as Devon & Cornwall Norththumbria ...

...; and a few other outlying regions all of whom have very very serious problems. But no means to rectify such other than to take matters into their own hands

Great Britain is now entering the death phase, technically bankrupt with very few resources  once Scotland departs

Senior academics are now in a most serious manner are stating that once England left on its own that the resultant impoverishment,corruption and inability to improve matters

Will lead to severe civil unrest that is more than capable of evolving into a full blown 2nd English civil war

History clearly demonstrates that when Empires  enter their final state of deacy

And death throes the one sure fire sign is when its leaders begin to refer to Make us great again,world class

A bright new dawn etc.etc

Then the final end and implosion is indeed nigh

And not only that at the final collapse then the whole thing ends up having retreated inward further than the boundaries of its birth  

This is not rocket science

Simply just ask yourself honestly what has Westminster got to offer other than decline,impoverishment,collapsing state pensions and health service etc etc 

People are not stupid they are beginning to wake up. Scotland has already done so and will Never rest till free

Does Boris think that telling us not to board the life boats  OF INDENPENDENCE upon The Sinking SS Britania saying that it is only a minor plumbing problem the ship has has its bow sinks below the water Line

And no amount of living in the past waving little Union Jacks singing Rule Britania or Land of Hope of Hope and Glory can possibly save it from its self inflicted sinking

It has already been fatally wounded below the water line and its fate sealed

END OF

The 'Civil War' comment may appear overblown and sensationalist, but in effect the cold War had already begun with the Brexit divisiveness. You need only look at the Mail and Express to see how they've duped middle England. 

If you think armed shootings and unrest are far fetched, you need only need look to the UKs big cousin in the US to see that it is certainly a possibility. Indeed, I'm certain the last politician to be gunned down in broad daylight happened in the UK in 2016 during the Brexit campaign. 

Sobering stuff. 

Sign up for free or login to reply to this topic

Want to reply to this topic? Login or register for free to post your message:

Find more Brexit and the EU topics from a particular area:


Register for free!

Login to your account

Gentlevan Removals
ASSSA Insurance
James Spanish School
AA Free English TV
Airport Service Taxi Mil Palmeras  Torre de la Horadada
Thy Will Be Done
interior building work
Jennifer Cunningham Insurances SL
Car Key Solutions
Blacktower Financial Management
Espana Dream Properties
Gran Alacant Insurances
Expat Services
Costa Blanca Building Specialists
Advertise your business here
Advertise your property
Help with my computer