aitchc1401 wrote on Thu Jun 18, 2020 8:05pm:
At the moment they are not using the app, there is a good outline of the process they are using in the Daily Telegraph,
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/0/nhs-test-trace-system-coronavirus-uk/
Read more...
I don't know about the claims you make in your post about the vendors developing the app,the length of data retention, etc, etc, where did you read that?
There are several government support programs for people who cannot work which should include anyone with covid19, I don't see why someone who is working and gets sick would not be entitled to sick pay. What's the alternative, ignore and potentially spread the virus regardless?
Rgds,
Aitch.
The information if from a number of media sources and government announcements about the app. It's all in the public domain.
In terms of support, yes there are a number of programs. The main one relates to furloughed staff who receive 80% of salary until July, after which the rules change. But the issue here is someone who isn't ill but has been asked to self isolate. In these circumstances furlough doesn't apply, nor does sick pay. Also furlough and duck pay don't apply to the self employed. So there are a great many people who could incur serious financial penalties. In addition, current reporting is down to individuals with no verification of contacts; how do you stop false or vindictive reporting?
What's the alternative? Work with others to establish common processes and technology taking into consideration data protection laws. Apple & Google have been working together on an agnostic app which holds encrypted data on the device. This is the basis several countries have successfully adopted & deployed. Why we have chosen to follow the path of countries like Saudi Arabia nstead I don't know.
Hope this gies some way to answering your points?