Posted: Sun Oct 15, 2017 8:28pm
Thanks for that Steve.
You may have seen my post, a few before this, noting that I had written some easy read guides to economic aspects, such as EFTA, EEA, WTO, etc.
As we stated, there is no point in trying to rerun the referendum debate.
I do think there is point in considering what type of Brexit we have. For example, could we be in EFTA and be part of the SM? Could we be part of the CU via the EEA? I may have those the wrong way round, but it is the principle that matters. What are WTO rules and how would they affect trade?
MPs have been putting all sorts of views on all of these things. We may even be asked our views as a members of the public.
If people do not try to understand these things and just wait to be told what will happen to them, then they get what they deserve.
If they look at the options and try to influence their MPS, whilst considering their own contingency plan under different scenarios, they have done the best they can and will be able to hit the ground running whatever the outcome. That of course is subject to my previous statement in another post that both the UK and the EU are capable of coming up with something that cannot be part of anyone's contingency plan :>)
I feel some people are just looking at their own individual situations and have little, if any, interest in what is good for the UK. I feel as if some people are waiting for others to give them the answers and have not looked at the contingencies themselves. Why do I feel this? If you look at the posts from start to finish on here there are those who pretty well post 'Please tell me what will happen. Please tell me what to do?' There are others who offer information and inference, provide links and suggest various possible routes. They also note that it is all speculation and people must look for themselves.